Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #69785 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-04-07 09:16 +1000 |
| Last post | 2014-04-07 09:16 +1000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Yet Another Switch-Case Syntax Proposal Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-04-07 09:16 +1000
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-07 09:16 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Yet Another Switch-Case Syntax Proposal |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8965.1396826189.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 6:13 AM, Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/06/2014 12:07 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> This has a slight oddity of parsing (in that an expression can >> normally have a comparison in it); if you really want to use the >> result of a comparison inside a case block, you'd have to parenthesize >> it. But it's easy enough to explain to a human. > > This syntax is almost identical to the if/elif/else syntax, though, no? Like I said, it's a short-hand for an if/elif tree, nothing more. Most of the proposals have effectively been that anyway. There are differences, though; the case target gets evaluated only once, for instance. I'm not pushing strongly for its addition to the language. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web