Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #69255 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-03-28 18:51 +1100 |
| Last post | 2014-03-28 18:51 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python language hack for C-style programmers [DO NOT USE!] :-) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-28 18:51 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-03-28 18:51 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Python language hack for C-style programmers [DO NOT USE!] :-) |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8659.1395993082.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: > Why would you guess if you can check? Just fire up the interactive > interpreter^W^W compiler: Partly because there's a difference between valid C++ and valid input to the G++ compiler :) Knowing that it works with g++ doesn't tell me that it's actually valid, and I don't feel like digging into the specs to find out where you're guaranteed to be allowed to do that. (I could probably test it with one of the language spec options, but then it still depends on the exact version of GCC and the exact spec chosen.) ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web