Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #12870 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Joe Riopel <goon12@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-09-06 23:49 -0400 |
| Last post | 2011-09-06 23:49 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: import os or import os.path Joe Riopel <goon12@gmail.com> - 2011-09-06 23:49 -0400
| From | Joe Riopel <goon12@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-09-06 23:49 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: import os or import os.path |
| Message-ID | <mailman.820.1315367376.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I want to use the 'os.path' module, it's enought to import 'os':
>
> import os
> if os.path.isfile('/usr/bin/bash'):
> print 'got it'
>
> In other source codes I noticed that people write 'import os.path' in
> this case. Which is better practice?
I just followed what the help said:
""
DESCRIPTION
Instead of importing this module directly, import os and refer to
this module as os.path.
""
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web