Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #12844 > unrolled thread

Re: PEP 20 - Silly Question?

Started byPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
First post2011-09-06 18:54 +0200
Last post2011-09-06 18:54 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: PEP 20 - Silly Question? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2011-09-06 18:54 +0200

#12844 — Re: PEP 20 - Silly Question?

FromPeter Otten <__peter__@web.de>
Date2011-09-06 18:54 +0200
SubjectRe: PEP 20 - Silly Question?
Message-ID<mailman.808.1315328096.27778.python-list@python.org>
Joseph Armbruster wrote:

> I have used Python for some time and ran a windows build-bot for a bit.
>  This morning, I told a fellow developer "There should be only one obvious
> way to do it." and then I proceeded to forward him to the Zen of Python
> and sent him a link to:
> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/
> 
> I noticed that it says only 19 of 20 have been written down.  Which one
> was not written down?

Whoever offers a $1 billion sponsorship to the PSF gets to decide that one.
Expect something like "Keep your baby real dry with black whole diapers".

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web