Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #67898 > unrolled thread

Re: script uses up all memory

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2014-03-06 11:33 +1100
Last post2014-03-06 11:33 +1100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: script uses up all memory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-06 11:33 +1100

#67898 — Re: script uses up all memory

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2014-03-06 11:33 +1100
SubjectRe: script uses up all memory
Message-ID<mailman.7852.1394066028.18130.python-list@python.org>
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I have a script that forks off other processes and attempts to manage
>>> them. Here is a stripped down version of the script:
>>>
>>>         self.sleepTime = 300
>>
>> That's not a stand-alone script.
>
> No, that is just the part that does the work (inside the 'while
> true'). I'll try and post a standalone script tomorrow.
>
>> What environment is it running in?
>
> CentOS 6,4

That's not the whole environment, though. There's a mention of Django
- does this run inside some framework?

>> Can you reproduce the problem outside of that environment?
>
> I will try that tomorrow.

Running as a stand-alone script, still under CentOS, would be what I
mean by "outside of that environment". I'm talking about making
something that can be saved to my drive and executed, perhaps with a
stubby subprocess script (eg "import time; time.sleep(86400)").

>> Also: Can you simply use multiprocessing rather than going through all
>> the effort of subprocess.Popen?
>
> Perhaps. I didn't write this. A client gave it to me and said 'figure
> out why it uses up all the memory and hangs.' I've messed around with
> for days and cannot see anything that would consume so much memory.

Ah. Yeah, that would be a fun little job to play with. My random
thought: Do the subprocesses produce spammy log output? If so, the
monitor might be collecting it all and holding it in memory in case
you want it (not knowing that you don't). The default should be to
leave them connected to your process's stdio streams, though, so that
shouldn't be the issue.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web