Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #12777 > unrolled thread

[OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77?

Started by"W. eWatson" <wolftracks@invalid.com>
First post2011-09-05 08:15 -0700
Last post2011-09-08 07:10 -0700
Articles 6 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

Contents

  [OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77? "W. eWatson" <wolftracks@invalid.com> - 2011-09-05 08:15 -0700
    Re: [OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-09-06 01:24 +1000
      Re: [OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77? "W. eWatson" <wolftracks@invalid.com> - 2011-09-05 09:15 -0700
        Re: [OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77? Dan Nagle <dannagle@verizon.net> - 2011-09-05 12:22 -0400
          Re: [OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77? "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2011-09-05 12:36 -0400
            Re: [OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77? "W. eWatson" <wolftracks@invalid.com> - 2011-09-08 07:10 -0700

#12777 — [OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77?

From"W. eWatson" <wolftracks@invalid.com>
Date2011-09-05 08:15 -0700
Subject[OT] Anyone here familiar with installing Open Watcom F77?
Message-ID<j42p3q$poq$1@dont-email.me>
See Subject.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#12778

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2011-09-06 01:24 +1000
Message-ID<mailman.775.1315236269.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#12777
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:15 AM, W. eWatson <wolftracks@invalid.com> wrote:
> See Subject.
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

To what extent "familiar"? I have it installed on several computers,
but only because it comes with Open Wat C/C++.

With something off-topic like this, it might be better to have a real
email address, so the responses can be off-list.

ChrisA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12780

From"W. eWatson" <wolftracks@invalid.com>
Date2011-09-05 09:15 -0700
Message-ID<j42sk7$lnj$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12778
On 9/5/2011 8:24 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:15 AM, W. eWatson<wolftracks@invalid.com>  wrote:
>> See Subject.
>> --
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>>
>
> To what extent "familiar"? I have it installed on several computers,
> but only because it comes with Open Wat C/C++.
>
> With something off-topic like this, it might be better to have a real
> email address, so the responses can be off-list.
>
> ChrisA

sierra_mtnview @ sbcglobal.net
Here's the story.

As far as I can tell F77 1.8 is not available.  I've Googled quite a bit 
for it.  My source for 1.9 is 
<http://www.openwatcom.org/index.php/Download>. It gives me: 
open-watcom-f77-win32-1.9.exe.

When I install, there are only choices: Custom, which presumably will 
ask a lot of questions, and some one shot do-it without any 
intervention.  I took the latter.

..., XP, and no Win7? I use Win7. Trouble??

Something is amiss with my install. I downloaded 1.9. I did not use any 
customization.

  I can bring up the IDE easily. Using it is a different matter. The 
only Getting Started in F77 manual I can find is shown as v1.8.  If 1.9 
is needed, I can't find it. If I use the 1.8 manual, then the contents 
don't match up with what I find in the F77 IDE.  For example, the manual 
talks about a Kitchen project on page 15.  Not found anywhere in the 
install folder.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12781

FromDan Nagle <dannagle@verizon.net>
Date2011-09-05 12:22 -0400
Message-ID<j42t0r$oht$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12780
Hello,

On 2011-09-05 16:15:20 +0000, W. eWatson said:

> On 9/5/2011 8:24 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:15 AM, W. eWatson<wolftracks@invalid.com>  wrote:
>>> See Subject.

<snip>

>>> To what extent "familiar"? I have it installed on several computers,
>> but only because it comes with Open Wat C/C++.
>> 
>> With something off-topic like this,

<snip>

>> sierra_mtnview @ sbcglobal.net
> Here's the story.
> 
> As far as I can tell F77 1.8 is not available.  I've Googled quite a 
> bit for it.  My source for 1.9 is 
> <http://www.openwatcom.org/index.php/Download>. It gives me: 
> open-watcom-f77-win32-1.9.exe.

On Usenet, comp.lang.fortran might be the best source of help for this.
There's a good chance one of the regulars there can answer you
within one or two posts.  (I'll not cross-post, you can choose for yourself.)

HTH

-- 
Cheers!

Dan Nagle

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12783

From"Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca>
Date2011-09-05 12:36 -0400
Message-ID<mailman.778.1315240645.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#12781
On 05-Sep-11 12:22 PM, Dan Nagle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2011-09-05 16:15:20 +0000, W. eWatson said:
>
>> On 9/5/2011 8:24 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:15 AM, W. eWatson<wolftracks@invalid.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> See Subject.
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> To what extent "familiar"? I have it installed on several computers,
>>> but only because it comes with Open Wat C/C++.
>>>
>>> With something off-topic like this,
>
> <snip>
>
>>> sierra_mtnview @ sbcglobal.net
>> Here's the story.
>>
>> As far as I can tell F77 1.8 is not available. I've Googled quite a
>> bit for it. My source for 1.9 is
>> <http://www.openwatcom.org/index.php/Download>. It gives me:
>> open-watcom-f77-win32-1.9.exe.
>
> On Usenet, comp.lang.fortran might be the best source of help for this.
> There's a good chance one of the regulars there can answer you
> within one or two posts. (I'll not cross-post, you can choose for
> yourself.)
>
> HTH
>

You might get in touch with someone at Waterloo University, which is 
located in Kitchener/Waterloo.

This could have come from the 60's or 70's.

Good luck.

Colin W.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12963

From"W. eWatson" <wolftracks@invalid.com>
Date2011-09-08 07:10 -0700
Message-ID<j4aifj$4c2$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12783
On 9/5/2011 9:36 AM, Colin J. Williams wrote:
> On 05-Sep-11 12:22 PM, Dan Nagle wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2011-09-05 16:15:20 +0000, W. eWatson said:
>>
>>> On 9/5/2011 8:24 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 1:15 AM, W. eWatson<wolftracks@invalid.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> See Subject.
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> To what extent "familiar"? I have it installed on several computers,
>>>> but only because it comes with Open Wat C/C++.
>>>>
>>>> With something off-topic like this,
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>> sierra_mtnview @ sbcglobal.net
>>> Here's the story.
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell F77 1.8 is not available. I've Googled quite a
>>> bit for it. My source for 1.9 is
>>> <http://www.openwatcom.org/index.php/Download>. It gives me:
>>> open-watcom-f77-win32-1.9.exe.
>>
>> On Usenet, comp.lang.fortran might be the best source of help for this.
>> There's a good chance one of the regulars there can answer you
>> within one or two posts. (I'll not cross-post, you can choose for
>> yourself.)
>>
>> HTH
>>
>
> You might get in touch with someone at Waterloo University, which is
> located in Kitchener/Waterloo.
>
> This could have come from the 60's or 70's.
>
> Good luck.
>
> Colin W.
>
Left a message on Tuesday. No return call. I'm starting to make progress 
on this.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web