Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #87840 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-03-23 14:07 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-03-23 14:07 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: fibonacci series what Iam is missing ? Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2015-03-23 14:07 -0400
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-03-23 14:07 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: fibonacci series what Iam is missing ? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.77.1427134087.10327.python-list@python.org> |
On 03/23/2015 12:59 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> wrote: >> An entirely separate question is whether you can gain performance by caching >> intermediate values. For example, if you capture values in a list, you >> could potentially save a lot of time, at least for non-trivial values of n. > > If you take a step back and seek to print a sequence of Fibonacci > numbers, rather than calculating specific ones based on their indices, > then you don't even need to consider caching. As soon as you've > printed out a number, you move right along. > But that's a big assumption. I assumed the comment on the function had a reasaonable meaning, that the OP assignment was to learn about recursion. If I were the instructor, I might have assigned them to print the fibonacci numbers backwards: 5 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 -- DaveA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web