Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #67169 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-02-27 16:57 -0500 |
| Last post | 2014-02-27 16:57 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Deepcopying a byte string is quicker than copying it - problem? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-02-27 16:57 -0500
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-02-27 16:57 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Deepcopying a byte string is quicker than copying it - problem? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7443.1393538266.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 2/27/2014 4:02 AM, Frank Millman wrote: >> However, deepcopying a byte string is orders of magnitude quicker than >> copying it. >> >> Actually, looking closer, it is the 'copy' that is slow, not the >> 'deepcopy' that is quick.. > I have created an issue on the bug tracker - > http://bugs.python.org/issue20791 Fixed, 12 hours later. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web