Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #67086 > unrolled thread

Re: Python : parsing the command line options using optparse

Started byGanesh Pal <ganesh1pal@gmail.com>
First post2014-02-26 15:00 +0530
Last post2014-02-26 02:55 -0800
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Python : parsing the command line options using optparse Ganesh Pal <ganesh1pal@gmail.com> - 2014-02-26 15:00 +0530
    Re: Python : parsing the command line options using optparse sffjunkie@gmail.com - 2014-02-26 02:55 -0800

#67086 — Re: Python : parsing the command line options using optparse

FromGanesh Pal <ganesh1pal@gmail.com>
Date2014-02-26 15:00 +0530
SubjectRe: Python : parsing the command line options using optparse
Message-ID<mailman.7386.1393407329.18130.python-list@python.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:

>As you are just starting I recommend that you use argparse instead of
 optparse.

 I would love to use argparse but  the script that I plan to write has to
run on host machines that Python 2.6

 I have freebsd clients  with python  2.6  dont want to install python new
version on all the host machine which will be eventually upgraded to 2.7 .

I wanted know if I could use argparse with python 2.6 and is it possible to
add  something like   #pkg_add -r install python-argparse and install
python argparse module before I use it.





> >If you are asking why short options don't work in conjunction with = -- I
> >don't know, it is probably a design choice of the optparse author.
> >argparse accepts short options with like -f=1234
>


 I wanted to know why my sample program does not work  with short hand
option (-p) and works with long hand option .

Here is what is happening ( only short hand with -)

# python-5.py -p=/ifs/1.txt -q=XOR  -f=1234 -n=1 -l

Usage: python-5.py [options]

python-5.py: error: option -q: invalid choice: '=XOR' (choose from 'XOR',
'ADD',

 'SET', 'MODIFY', 'RENAME', 'DELETE', 'KILL')


Result :says  invalid choice: '=XOR'





Long hand Works ( -- , or double hypen ) fine.

C:\Users\bahadg\Desktop>python python-5.py --path=/ifs/1.txt
--operation=XOR  --

offset=1234 --node=1 --log --fixcrc

/ifs/1.txt

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#67088

Fromsffjunkie@gmail.com
Date2014-02-26 02:55 -0800
Message-ID<a098ce5f-467a-40cd-8085-bb9275168461@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#67086
On Wednesday, 26 February 2014 09:30:21 UTC, Ganesh Pal  wrote:
> Here is what is happening ( only short hand with -)
> 
> # python-5.py -p=/ifs/1.txt -q=XOR  -f=1234 -n=1 -l
> 
> Usage: python-5.py [options]
> python-5.py: error: option -q: invalid choice: '=XOR' (choose from 'XOR', 'ADD',
> 
>  'SET', 'MODIFY', 'RENAME', 'DELETE', 'KILL')

Short hand options don't use '=' signs. Try

python-5.py -p /ifs/1.txt -q XOR  -f 1234 -n 1 -l

--Simon

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web