Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #66589 > unrolled thread

select(sock) indicates not-ready, but sock.recv does not block

Started byNikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
First post2014-02-16 22:35 -0800
Last post2014-02-17 08:04 -0500
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  select(sock) indicates not-ready, but sock.recv does not block Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> - 2014-02-16 22:35 -0800
    Re: select(sock) indicates not-ready, but sock.recv does not block Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-17 08:04 -0500

#66589 — select(sock) indicates not-ready, but sock.recv does not block

FromNikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org>
Date2014-02-16 22:35 -0800
Subjectselect(sock) indicates not-ready, but sock.recv does not block
Message-ID<mailman.7083.1392618926.18130.python-list@python.org>
Hello,

I have a problem with using select. I can reliably reproduce a situation
where select.select((sock.fileno(),), (), (), 0) returns ((),(),())
(i.e., no data ready for reading), but an immediately following
sock.recv() returns data without blocking.

I am pretty sure that this is not a race condition. The behavor is 100%
reproducible, the program is single threaded, and even waiting for 10
seconds before the select() call does not change the result.

I'm running Python 3.3.3 under Linux 3.12.

Has anyone an idea what might be going wrong here?

Thanks,
-Nikolaus

-- 
Encrypted emails preferred.
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6  02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C

             »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#66602

FromRoy Smith <roy@panix.com>
Date2014-02-17 08:04 -0500
Message-ID<roy-424605.08041317022014@news.panix.com>
In reply to#66589
In article <mailman.7083.1392618926.18130.python-list@python.org>,
 Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I have a problem with using select. I can reliably reproduce a situation
> where select.select((sock.fileno(),), (), (), 0) returns ((),(),())
> (i.e., no data ready for reading), but an immediately following
> sock.recv() returns data without blocking.
> 
> I am pretty sure that this is not a race condition. The behavor is 100%
> reproducible, the program is single threaded, and even waiting for 10
> seconds before the select() call does not change the result.
> 
> I'm running Python 3.3.3 under Linux 3.12.
> 
> Has anyone an idea what might be going wrong here?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Nikolaus

Can you post the code which demonstrates this?

Also, with any kind of networking problem, tcpdump is your fried.  When 
you run your code, use tcpdump to watch all the network traffic on 
whatever port your socket is bound to.  That might give you some clues 
what's going on.

Likewise, I would also strace the process and watch all the network 
system calls.  The problem you're describing might be unexpected 
behavior in Python, or it might be in the kernel.  Watching the actual 
system calls that are generated will narrow it down to which.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web