Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #108650 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.parissis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-05-16 01:17 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-05-16 01:17 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: intermittent ValueErrors from subprocess Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.parissis@gmail.com> - 2016-05-16 01:17 +0200
| From | Pavlos Parissis <pavlos.parissis@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-05-16 01:17 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: intermittent ValueErrors from subprocess |
| Message-ID | <mailman.7.1463354266.19823.python-list@python.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 16/05/2016 12:59 πμ, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Pavlos Parissis > <pavlos.parissis@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Searching the CPython sources for that exception shows one hit: >>> selectors.py, where it converts a file object to an integer file >>> descriptor. (You could have helped out by showing us the full >>> traceback.) >> >> I did, https://gist.github.com/unixsurfer/67db620d87f667423f6f6e3a04e0bff5 > > Ah. I didn't click that link in your original post - didn't know it > was the traceback. Better would have been to at least say so; best > would have been to include it inline. > I don't usually include traces as they have long lines and several e-mail clients mess with them in a way that makes the trace unreadable. >>> Is it possible you were running out of file descriptors, >>> or in some other way unable to create the pipe? >> >> I don't think as I see right now only 8 FDs: >> >> sudo ls -1 /proc/22706/fd|wc >> 8 8 16 >> > > If you can recreate the problem consistently, I can't. This is my main problem. This code has been executed ~100K and that exception has occurred only ~5 times. > it would be worth > messing around with slightly lower level APIs - using subprocess.Popen > rather than check_output, for instance - and see what you can do > without the pipes. What do you mean by that? > Somewhere, something's failing, and it's not easy > to see what. > > ChrisA > Thanks once again, Pavlos
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web