Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #34527 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-12-09 16:35 -0800 |
| Last post | 2012-12-09 17:34 -0800 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Creating different classes dynamically? Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> - 2012-12-09 16:35 -0800
Re: Creating different classes dynamically? Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-12-09 19:53 -0500
Re: Creating different classes dynamically? Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> - 2012-12-09 17:34 -0800
Re: Creating different classes dynamically? Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> - 2012-12-09 17:34 -0800
| From | Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-09 16:35 -0800 |
| Subject | Creating different classes dynamically? |
| Message-ID | <6bf5d1ed-b158-468e-9c51-a566a8b9bfb8@googlegroups.com> |
Hi,
I have a directory tree with various XML configuration files.
I then have separate classes for each type, which all inherit from a base. E.g.
class AnimalConfigurationParser:
...
class DogConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
...
class CatConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
....
I can identify the type of configuration file from the root XML tag.
I'd like to walk through the directory tree, and create different objects based on the type of configuration file:
for root, dirs, files in os.walk('./'):
for file in files:
if file.startswith('ml') and file.endswith('.xml') and 'entity' not in file:
with open(os.path.join(root, file), 'r') as f:
try:
tree = etree.parse(f)
root = tree.getroot()
print(f.name)
print(root.tag)
# Do something to create the appropriate type of parser
except xml.parsers.expat.ExpatError as e:
print('Unable to parse file {0} - {1}'.format(f.name, e.message))
I have a dict with the root tags - I was thinking of mapping these directly to the functions - however, I'm not sure if that's the right way to do it? Is there a more Pythonic way of doing this?
root_tags = {
'DogRootTag': DogConfigurationParser(),
'CatRootTag': CatConfigurationParser(),
}
Cheers,
Victor
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Angel <d@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-09 19:53 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.665.1355100892.29569.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #34527 |
On 12/09/2012 07:35 PM, Victor Hooi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a directory tree with various XML configuration files.
>
> I then have separate classes for each type, which all inherit from a base. E.g.
>
> class AnimalConfigurationParser:
> ...
>
> class DogConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
> ...
>
> class CatConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
> ....
>
> I can identify the type of configuration file from the root XML tag.
>
> I'd like to walk through the directory tree, and create different objects based on the type of configuration file:
>
> for root, dirs, files in os.walk('./'):
> for file in files:
> if file.startswith('ml') and file.endswith('.xml') and 'entity' not in file:
> with open(os.path.join(root, file), 'r') as f:
> try:
> tree = etree.parse(f)
> root = tree.getroot()
> print(f.name)
> print(root.tag)
> # Do something to create the appropriate type of parser
> except xml.parsers.expat.ExpatError as e:
> print('Unable to parse file {0} - {1}'.format(f.name, e.message))
>
> I have a dict with the root tags - I was thinking of mapping these directly to the functions - however, I'm not sure if that's the right way to do it? Is there a more Pythonic way of doing this?
>
> root_tags = {
> 'DogRootTag': DogConfigurationParser(),
> 'CatRootTag': CatConfigurationParser(),
> }
>
> Cheers,
> Victor
Your subject line says you want to create the classes dynamically, but
that's not what your code implies. if you just want to decide which
class to INSTANTIATE dynamically, that's easily done, and you have it
almost right. In your dict you should leave off those parentheses.
Then the parser creation looks something like:
parser_instance = root_tags[root.tag] (arg1, arg2)
where the arg1, arg2 are whatever arguments the __init__ of these
classes expects.
(untested)
--
DaveA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-09 17:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <bae8f804-35c4-4857-9ecc-53a9bd2bb128@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #34530 |
heya,
Dave: Ahah, thanks =).
You're right, my terminology was off, I want to dynamically *instantiate*, not create new classes.
And yes, removing the brackets worked =).
Cheers,
Victor
On Monday, 10 December 2012 11:53:30 UTC+11, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 12/09/2012 07:35 PM, Victor Hooi wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > I have a directory tree with various XML configuration files.
>
> >
>
> > I then have separate classes for each type, which all inherit from a base. E.g.
>
> >
>
> > class AnimalConfigurationParser:
>
> > ...
>
> >
>
> > class DogConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
>
> > ...
>
> >
>
> > class CatConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
>
> > ....
>
> >
>
> > I can identify the type of configuration file from the root XML tag.
>
> >
>
> > I'd like to walk through the directory tree, and create different objects based on the type of configuration file:
>
> >
>
> > for root, dirs, files in os.walk('./'):
>
> > for file in files:
>
> > if file.startswith('ml') and file.endswith('.xml') and 'entity' not in file:
>
> > with open(os.path.join(root, file), 'r') as f:
>
> > try:
>
> > tree = etree.parse(f)
>
> > root = tree.getroot()
>
> > print(f.name)
>
> > print(root.tag)
>
> > # Do something to create the appropriate type of parser
>
> > except xml.parsers.expat.ExpatError as e:
>
> > print('Unable to parse file {0} - {1}'.format(f.name, e.message))
>
> >
>
> > I have a dict with the root tags - I was thinking of mapping these directly to the functions - however, I'm not sure if that's the right way to do it? Is there a more Pythonic way of doing this?
>
> >
>
> > root_tags = {
>
> > 'DogRootTag': DogConfigurationParser(),
>
> > 'CatRootTag': CatConfigurationParser(),
>
> > }
>
> >
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Victor
>
>
>
> Your subject line says you want to create the classes dynamically, but
>
> that's not what your code implies. if you just want to decide which
>
> class to INSTANTIATE dynamically, that's easily done, and you have it
>
> almost right. In your dict you should leave off those parentheses.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Then the parser creation looks something like:
>
> parser_instance = root_tags[root.tag] (arg1, arg2)
>
>
>
> where the arg1, arg2 are whatever arguments the __init__ of these
>
> classes expects.
>
>
>
> (untested)
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> DaveA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Victor Hooi <victorhooi@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-09 17:34 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.668.1355105479.29569.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #34530 |
heya,
Dave: Ahah, thanks =).
You're right, my terminology was off, I want to dynamically *instantiate*, not create new classes.
And yes, removing the brackets worked =).
Cheers,
Victor
On Monday, 10 December 2012 11:53:30 UTC+11, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 12/09/2012 07:35 PM, Victor Hooi wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> >
>
> > I have a directory tree with various XML configuration files.
>
> >
>
> > I then have separate classes for each type, which all inherit from a base. E.g.
>
> >
>
> > class AnimalConfigurationParser:
>
> > ...
>
> >
>
> > class DogConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
>
> > ...
>
> >
>
> > class CatConfigurationParser(AnimalConfigurationParser):
>
> > ....
>
> >
>
> > I can identify the type of configuration file from the root XML tag.
>
> >
>
> > I'd like to walk through the directory tree, and create different objects based on the type of configuration file:
>
> >
>
> > for root, dirs, files in os.walk('./'):
>
> > for file in files:
>
> > if file.startswith('ml') and file.endswith('.xml') and 'entity' not in file:
>
> > with open(os.path.join(root, file), 'r') as f:
>
> > try:
>
> > tree = etree.parse(f)
>
> > root = tree.getroot()
>
> > print(f.name)
>
> > print(root.tag)
>
> > # Do something to create the appropriate type of parser
>
> > except xml.parsers.expat.ExpatError as e:
>
> > print('Unable to parse file {0} - {1}'.format(f.name, e.message))
>
> >
>
> > I have a dict with the root tags - I was thinking of mapping these directly to the functions - however, I'm not sure if that's the right way to do it? Is there a more Pythonic way of doing this?
>
> >
>
> > root_tags = {
>
> > 'DogRootTag': DogConfigurationParser(),
>
> > 'CatRootTag': CatConfigurationParser(),
>
> > }
>
> >
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Victor
>
>
>
> Your subject line says you want to create the classes dynamically, but
>
> that's not what your code implies. if you just want to decide which
>
> class to INSTANTIATE dynamically, that's easily done, and you have it
>
> almost right. In your dict you should leave off those parentheses.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Then the parser creation looks something like:
>
> parser_instance = root_tags[root.tag] (arg1, arg2)
>
>
>
> where the arg1, arg2 are whatever arguments the __init__ of these
>
> classes expects.
>
>
>
> (untested)
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> DaveA
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web