Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #93141 > unrolled thread

Re: windows and file names > 256 bytes

Started byMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
First post2015-06-25 07:35 -0600
Last post2015-06-25 07:35 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: windows and file names > 256 bytes Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-06-25 07:35 -0600

#93141 — Re: windows and file names > 256 bytes

FromMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Date2015-06-25 07:35 -0600
SubjectRe: windows and file names > 256 bytes
Message-ID<mailman.66.1435239311.3674.python-list@python.org>
On 06/25/2015 06:34 AM, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 25/06/2015 13:04, Joonas Liik wrote:
>> It sounds to me more like it is possible to use long file names on windows
>> but it is a pain and in python, on windows it is basically impossible.
> 
> Certainly not impossible: you could write your own wrapper function:
> 
> def extended_path(p):
>     return r"\\?\%s" % os.path.abspath(p)
> 
> where you knew that there was a possibility of long paths and that an
> absolute path would work.

The OP mentions that even when he manually supplies extended paths,
os.mkdir, os.getsize, and shutil.rmtree return errors for him in Python
2.7.  So there's more to this problem.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web