Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #21623 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-03-14 13:13 -0500 |
| Last post | 2012-03-14 13:13 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Is there a ConfigParser which keeps comments Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-03-14 13:13 -0500
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-03-14 13:13 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Is there a ConfigParser which keeps comments |
| Message-ID | <mailman.648.1331751843.3037.python-list@python.org> |
On 03/14/12 12:06, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 3/14/2012 6:07 AM, Gelonida N wrote: >> Now I'm looking for a library, which behaves like config parser, but >> with one minor difference. >> >> The write() mehtod should keep existing comments. > > Assuming that you have not overlooked anything, I would just subclass > ConfigParser with an altered write method. It would require a lot more than that. It would entail changing the reading as well so that it preserved the comments as well as the order of sections & keys, and a way of storing those associated comments in sequence. I looked into it a fair while back and it was a LOT more work than I cared to do for minimal gain. I wimped out and just documented it with "If you use the ability to (re)write a configuration file, it will not keep any comments or ordering from any original sources." -tkc
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web