Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #109639 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-07 16:34 -0600 |
| Last post | 2016-06-07 16:34 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Recommendation for GUI lib? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-06-07 16:34 -0600
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-07 16:34 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Recommendation for GUI lib? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.64.1465338894.2306.python-list@python.org> |
Accidentally didn't reply to the list... On 06/07/2016 03:45 PM, Roland Koebler via Python-list wrote: > You can also try Qt (http://qt.io), and one of its Python-bindings. > But I was never happy with Qt and think some GUI-concepts of GTK+ are much > better than the ones of Qt, and I like Glade much more than the Qt designer. Yes there are some concepts in regards to GUI layout that are different from Qt and GTK. Particularly how widgets are packed into boxes and how they resize. At first I didn't like the Qt model with its "spring" spacer thing. But I got used to it and found it was actually more flexible than GTK's packing method. Just a slightly different way of thinking about layout is all. I think the GTK bindings are a bit more comfortable in Python that Qt's are. Often times Qt apps turn out more like C++ apps transliterated into Python. They don't quite feel as "pythonic" as the GTK+ apps. Both are excellent toolkits. I think Qt is more complete and has more batteries included, particularly on the other platforms. For example, vector graphics. GTK+ defers that to Cairo. All that said, I still prefer GTK also.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web