Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #65152 > unrolled thread

Re: __init__ is the initialiser

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-02-01 10:59 +1100

#65152 — Re: __init__ is the initialiser

Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> writes:

> On 1/31/14 6:05 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Here we disagree. I think the meaning “… and that returns the new
> > instance” is entailed in the meaning of “constructor”.
> > […]
>
> You say these terms already have meanings, and that constructor means
> a function that returns the new instance. Then your word "constructor"
> isn't the same as C++'s word "constructor"? Those don't return the
> instance. Neither do Java constructors. In terms of the code
> developers actually write in __init__, it looks an awful lot like a
> C++ or Java constructor, and serves precisely the same purpose.

These are good points, thanks for raising them.

-- 
 \     Lucifer: “Just sign the Contract, sir, and the Piano is yours.” |
  `\     Ray: “Sheesh! This is long! Mind if I sign it now and read it |
_o__)                                later?” —http://www.achewood.com/ |
Ben Finney

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web