Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #43588 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-14 17:13 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-04-14 17:13 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-04-14 17:13 -0700
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-14 17:13 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names |
| Message-ID | <mailman.610.1365986108.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 04/14/2013 02:50 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Quirky question time!
>
> When you read out a qualified name, eg collections.OrderedDict, do you
> read the qualifier ("collections dot ordered dict"), or do you elide
> it ("ordered dict")? I ask because it makes a difference to talking
> about just one of them:
>
> ... or possibly a collections.OrderedDict...
> ... or possibly an collections.OrderedDict...
>
> Written, the latter looks completely wrong; but if the name is read in
> its short form, with the "collections" part being implicit, then "an"
> is clearly correct! What do you think, experts and others?
Explicit is better than implicit. ;)
"collections dot ordereddict"
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web