Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43588 > unrolled thread

Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names

Started byEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
First post2013-04-14 17:13 -0700
Last post2013-04-14 17:13 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-04-14 17:13 -0700

#43588 — Re: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names

FromEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Date2013-04-14 17:13 -0700
SubjectRe: Grammar question: Englisn and Python: qualified names
Message-ID<mailman.610.1365986108.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 04/14/2013 02:50 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Quirky question time!
>
> When you read out a qualified name, eg collections.OrderedDict, do you
> read the qualifier ("collections dot ordered dict"), or do you elide
> it ("ordered dict")? I ask because it makes a difference to talking
> about just one of them:
>
> ... or possibly a collections.OrderedDict...
> ... or possibly an collections.OrderedDict...
>
> Written, the latter looks completely wrong; but if the name is read in
> its short form, with the "collections" part being implicit, then "an"
> is clearly correct! What do you think, experts and others?

Explicit is better than implicit.  ;)


"collections dot ordereddict"

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web