Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #64887 > unrolled thread

Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords? Vito De Tullio <vito.detullio@gmail.com> - 2014-01-28 01:50 +0100
    Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords? wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-01-27 23:19 -0800
      Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-28 08:39 +0000
      Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-01-28 11:16 +0000
      Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords? Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-01-28 14:38 -0500
        Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords? Piet van Oostrum <piet@vanoostrum.org> - 2014-01-29 14:30 +0100
      Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2014-01-28 14:09 -0700

#64887 — Re: Highlighting program variables instead of keywords?

Skip Montanaro wrote:

> My son sent me a link to an essay about highlighting program data instead
> of keywords:
> 
> https://medium.com/p/3a6db2743a1e/
> 
> I think this might have value, especially if to could bounce back and
> forth between both schemes. Is anyone aware of tools like this for Python?

AFAIK kdevelop support this.

http://kdevelop.org/sites/kdevelop.org/files/photos/kdev_python_1.png


-- 
By ZeD

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#64891

Different, but a little bit related. The work
which is done actually on the possibility (not
implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style")
the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.

Python with its absurd Flexible String Representation
just become a no go for the kind of task.

(Should not be too complicate to understand.)

jmf

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#64896

On 28/01/2014 07:19, wxjmfauth@gmail.com wrote:
> Different, but a little bit related. The work
> which is done actually on the possibility (not
> implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style")
> the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
>
> Python with its absurd Flexible String Representation
> just become a no go for the kind of task.
>
> (Should not be too complicate to understand.)
>
> jmf
>

This guy has surely exceeded his "three strikes and you're out" limit? 
Please, please somebody do something about it, he's driving me insane 
with this continuous drivel.  No thread appears to be safe from him 
jumping in with this nonsense.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#64903

On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:19:03 -0800, wxjmfauth wrote:

> Different, but a little bit related. The work which is done actually on
> the possibility (not implemented but alreay realized) to colorize
> (style") the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
> 
> Python with its absurd Flexible String Representation just become a no
> go for the kind of task.
> 
> (Should not be too complicate to understand.)

No, not complicated at all. 

Water is wet, therefore the FSR is rubbish.

Athens is the capital of Greece, therefor the FSR is rubbish.

1+1 = 2, therefore the FSR is rubbish.

The South American Potoo is a member of the Nyctibiidae family, therefore 
the FSR is rubbish.

We get the point, thank you.


-- 
Steven

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#64918

On 1/28/14 2:19 AM, wxjmfauth@gmail.com wrote:
> Different, but a little bit related. The work
> which is done actually on the possibility (not
> implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style")
> the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
>
> Python with its absurd Flexible String Representation
> just become a no go for the kind of task.
>
> (Should not be too complicate to understand.)
>
> jmf
>

JMF, seriously, stop it.  You've convinced no one because you have no 
convincing arguments.

It's obnoxious to continue to make this claim.  Stop it.  Please.

If you want to try to convince someone, convince me.  Write to me 
offline: ned@nedbatchelder.com

-- 
Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#64940

Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> writes:

> On 1/28/14 2:19 AM, wxjmfauth@gmail.com wrote:
>> Different, but a little bit related. The work
>> which is done actually on the possibility (not
>> implemented but alreay realized) to colorize (style")
>> the different graphemes of a glyph is very interesting.
>>
>> Python with its absurd Flexible String Representation
>> just become a no go for the kind of task.
>>
>> (Should not be too complicate to understand.)
>>
>> jmf
>>
>
> JMF, seriously, stop it.  You've convinced no one because you have no
> convincing arguments.
>
> It's obnoxious to continue to make this claim.  Stop it.  Please.
>
> If you want to try to convince someone, convince me.  Write to me
> offline: ned@nedbatchelder.com
>
> -- 
> Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com
>

I seriously think jmf has a mental disorder. So these reactions won't do anything useful. Just ignore.
-- 
Piet van Oostrum <piet@vanoostrum.org>
WWW: http://pietvanoostrum.com/
PGP key: [8DAE142BE17999C4]

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#64922

On 01/28/2014 12:38 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> JMF, seriously, stop it.  You've convinced no one because you have no 
> convincing arguments.
> 
> It's obnoxious to continue to make this claim.  Stop it.  Please.
> 
> If you want to try to convince someone, convince me.  Write to me 
> offline: ned@nedbatchelder.com

JMF, maybe if you'd actually try to write a program in Python that does
what you are talking about with "colorizing graphemes," (whatever that
means) then you can talk.  Sounds to me like you don't even use Python
at all, for unicode or anything else.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web