Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #64681 > unrolled thread

Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists

Started byVincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net>
First post2014-01-24 07:08 -0600
Last post2014-01-24 07:08 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> - 2014-01-24 07:08 -0600

#64681 — Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists

FromVincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net>
Date2014-01-24 07:08 -0600
SubjectRe: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists
Message-ID<mailman.5939.1390570701.18130.python-list@python.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:

> Then, how do you think Python /knows/ that it has to repeat the code 10
> times on my "slow" and 100 times on your "fast" machine? It runs the bench
> once, then 10, then 100, then 1000 times -- until there's a run that takes
> 0.2 secs or more. The total expected minimum time without startup overhead
> is then
>

​Ah, I did not know about the calibration. That and I did not notice the
100 on my machine vs 10 on yours.​


Vincent Davis

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web