Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64681 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-24 07:08 -0600 |
| Last post | 2014-01-24 07:08 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> - 2014-01-24 07:08 -0600
| From | Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-24 07:08 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5939.1390570701.18130.python-list@python.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote: > Then, how do you think Python /knows/ that it has to repeat the code 10 > times on my "slow" and 100 times on your "fast" machine? It runs the bench > once, then 10, then 100, then 1000 times -- until there's a run that takes > 0.2 secs or more. The total expected minimum time without startup overhead > is then > ​Ah, I did not know about the calibration. That and I did not notice the 100 on my machine vs 10 on yours.​ Vincent Davis
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web