Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64650 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-23 20:11 -0500 |
| Last post | 2014-01-23 20:11 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-23 20:11 -0500
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-23 20:11 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5922.1390525924.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 1/23/2014 8:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > The noise asking for a 2.8 isn't going to die down any time soon. I suspect you meant "isn't going to die completely" > It'll flare up again every time there's a significant event in the > 2.7's end of life: when it goes into source-only support, when its > python.org support ends entirely, when Debian's next version won't > ship it, when Red Hat's ditto ditto, when it's no longer possible to > get it from Ubuntu's repositories, etc, etc, etc. And no amount of > "There will be no 2.8 unless you make it yourself!" will change that. > > That's my prediction. Sadly, mine too. Maybe the flareup peaks will gradually become lower. Or maybe they will not be discussed so much on python-list. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web