Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #64650 > unrolled thread

Re: The potential for a Python 2.8.

Started byTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
First post2014-01-23 20:11 -0500
Last post2014-01-23 20:11 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: The potential for a Python 2.8. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-23 20:11 -0500

#64650 — Re: The potential for a Python 2.8.

FromTerry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Date2014-01-23 20:11 -0500
SubjectRe: The potential for a Python 2.8.
Message-ID<mailman.5922.1390525924.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 1/23/2014 8:00 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:

> The noise asking for a 2.8 isn't going to die down any time soon.

I suspect you meant "isn't going to die completely"

> It'll flare up again every time there's a significant event in the
> 2.7's end of life: when it goes into source-only support, when its
> python.org support ends entirely, when Debian's next version won't
> ship it, when Red Hat's ditto ditto, when it's no longer possible to
> get it from Ubuntu's repositories, etc, etc, etc. And no amount of
> "There will be no 2.8 unless you make it yourself!" will change that.
>
> That's my prediction.

Sadly, mine too. Maybe the flareup peaks will gradually become lower. Or 
maybe they will not be discussed so much on python-list.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web