Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64621 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-23 11:18 -0500 |
| Last post | 2014-01-23 11:18 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re:generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-23 11:18 -0500
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-23 11:18 -0500 |
| Subject | Re:generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5898.1390493790.18130.python-list@python.org> |
Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> Wrote in message: > (something about your message seems to make it unquotable) 64gig is 4^18, so you can forget about holding a string of size 4^50 If memory size is your issue, why not make the function a generator, by replacing the append with a yield? -- DaveA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web