Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #64621 > unrolled thread

Re:generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists

Started byDave Angel <davea@davea.name>
First post2014-01-23 11:18 -0500
Last post2014-01-23 11:18 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re:generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-01-23 11:18 -0500

#64621 — Re:generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists

FromDave Angel <davea@davea.name>
Date2014-01-23 11:18 -0500
SubjectRe:generate De Bruijn sequence memory and string vs lists
Message-ID<mailman.5898.1390493790.18130.python-list@python.org>
 Vincent Davis <vincent@vincentdavis.net> Wrote in message:
> 
(something about your message seems to make it unquotable)

64gig is 4^18, so you can forget about holding a string of size 4^50

If memory size is your issue,  why not make the function a
 generator,  by replacing the append with a yield?
 

-- 
DaveA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web