Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #64459 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-21 22:52 +0000 |
| Last post | 2014-01-21 22:52 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
RE: Implementing append within a descriptor "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> - 2014-01-21 22:52 +0000
| From | "Joseph L. Casale" <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-21 22:52 +0000 |
| Subject | RE: Implementing append within a descriptor |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5825.1390344784.18130.python-list@python.org> |
> You're going to have to subclass list if you want to intercept its > methods. As I see it, there are two ways you could do that: when it's > set, or when it's retrieved. I'd be inclined to do it in __set__, but > either could work. In theory, you could make it practically invisible > - just check to see if you're trying to __set__ a list, and if you > are, set a magical list instead. Hey Chris, That actually is sufficient, assignment can be intercepted and retyped so an append will accomplish what I need. Thanks! jlc
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web