Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #20425 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-02-14 20:43 -0500 |
| Last post | 2012-02-14 20:43 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: re module: Nothing to repeat, but no sre_constants.error: nothing to repeat ? Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2012-02-14 20:43 -0500
| From | Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-02-14 20:43 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: re module: Nothing to repeat, but no sre_constants.error: nothing to repeat ? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5816.1329270228.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:05 PM, MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: >> And yeah, even something as crazy as ()* works, but as soon as it >> becomes (a*)* it doesn't work. Weird. >> > I think it's a combination of warning the user about something that's > pointless, > as in the case of "$*", and producing a pattern which could cause the > internal > regex engine to get stuck in an infinite loop. Considering that ()* works fine, I can't imagine it ever gets stuck in infinite loops. But I admit I am too lazy to check against the interpreter. Also, complete failure is an exceptionally (heh) poor way of warning people about stuff. I hope that's not really it. -- Devin
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web