Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #64328 > unrolled thread

Re: Documentation of dict views change request

Started byMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
First post2014-01-19 21:41 +0000
Last post2014-01-19 21:41 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Documentation of dict views change request Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-19 21:41 +0000

#64328 — Re: Documentation of dict views change request

FromMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2014-01-19 21:41 +0000
SubjectRe: Documentation of dict views change request
Message-ID<mailman.5729.1390167711.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 19/01/2014 21:26, Charles Hixson wrote:
> Could it please be clearly documented that keys(), values(), and items()
> are not writeable.  I agree that this is how they should be, but it
> would be still better if they were clearly documented as such.  The
> labeling of them as dynamic, while true, was a bit confusing here.
> (I.e., it was talking about changing their value through other means of
> access rather than directly through the returned values.)
>
> P.S.:  Is it reasonable to return the items() of a dict in order to pass
> a read only copy of the values?
>

Just raise an issue here http://bugs.python.org/

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web