Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43528 > unrolled thread

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

Started byMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
First post2013-04-13 11:14 -0600
Last post2013-04-13 11:14 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:14 -0600

#43528 — Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

FromMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Date2013-04-13 11:14 -0600
SubjectRe: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2
Message-ID<mailman.559.1365873255.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 04/13/2013 12:28 AM, Mark Janssen wrote:
>> Mark, this proposal is out of place on a Python list, because it proposes an
>> object methodology radically different from any that is implemented in
>> Python now, or is even remotely likely to be implemented in Python in the
>> future.
> 
> Wow, you guys are a bunch of ninnies.  I'm going to find some
> theoretical folks....

Insulting list members is not a great way to gain traction.  Ned is
correct, though.  Your discussion is best held in another place where
theoretical folks do hang out.  Perhaps you should get together with
Ranting Rick.  Like you he lacks a formal background in language
development, but also like you has strong opinions on how things should
be done differently.  Maybe you can roll your ideas into his Rython
language.  On this list I think the vast majority of us simply want to
discuss how to effectively use Python to solve our problems.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web