Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #20056 > unrolled thread

Re: Re: frozendict

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Re: frozendict Evan Driscoll <edriscoll@wisc.edu> - 2012-02-08 23:40 -0600

#20056 — Re: Re: frozendict

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On 13:59, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> Define "doesn't suck".  If I were to hack one up, it would look
> something like this:
>
>
> from collections import Mapping, Hashable

So part of my objection was that I wanted to make sure I got all of the
expected functionality, and that takes a bunch of functions. I didn't
know about the ABTs in 'collections' though, so that helps a bit.

However, I'd still prefer something that guaranteed immutability better
than that. I might just be fighting the language too much at that point
though...

Evan

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web