Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #20006 > unrolled thread

turbogears 1

Started byanon hung <anonhung@gmail.com>
First post2012-02-08 06:17 +0100
Last post2012-02-09 11:26 -0500
Articles 8 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  turbogears 1 anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> - 2012-02-08 06:17 +0100
    Re: turbogears 1 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-02-08 00:33 -0500
      Re: turbogears 1 Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-02-08 06:03 +0000
        Re: turbogears 1 anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 05:55 +0100
        Fwd: turbogears 1 anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 05:59 +0100
      Re: turbogears 1 anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> - 2012-02-09 05:53 +0100
        Re: turbogears 1 Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2012-02-09 09:01 -0500
          Re: turbogears 1 Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-02-09 11:26 -0500

#20006 — turbogears 1

Fromanon hung <anonhung@gmail.com>
Date2012-02-08 06:17 +0100
Subjectturbogears 1
Message-ID<mailman.5533.1328678241.27778.python-list@python.org>
Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
thing..........

First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
recent version but even that is being abandoned. Am I basically given
vaporware? Does anyone have any up to date info?

Best,
Hung

-- 
Viktor Orban Prime minister of Hungary
http://spreadingviktororban.weebly.com

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#20007

FromRoy Smith <roy@panix.com>
Date2012-02-08 00:33 -0500
Message-ID<roy-A56DB5.00335508022012@news.panix.com>
In reply to#20006
In article <mailman.5533.1328678241.27778.python-list@python.org>,
 anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
> thing..........
> 
> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
> recent version but even that is being abandoned.

Yup, looks dead to me.  Hasn't had a release in almost 2 months or a 
commit to the GIT repo in 2 days.  Must be nailed to its perch or 
something.

http://turbogears.org/en/current-status
http://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/tg2/commit_browser

> Am I basically given vaporware? Does anyone have any up to date info?

Have you considered Ruby on Rails?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#20011

FromSteven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>
Date2012-02-08 06:03 +0000
Message-ID<4f321034$0$1615$c3e8da3$76491128@news.astraweb.com>
In reply to#20007
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:33:55 -0500, Roy Smith wrote:

> In article <mailman.5533.1328678241.27778.python-list@python.org>,
>  anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>> python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears thing..........
>> 
>> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
>> recent version but even that is being abandoned.
> 
> Yup, looks dead to me.  Hasn't had a release in almost 2 months or a
> commit to the GIT repo in 2 days.  Must be nailed to its perch or
> something.
> 
> http://turbogears.org/en/current-status
> http://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/tg2/commit_browser

Ohhh, sarcasm... 

To the original poster: what makes you think that Turbogears 2 is 
abandoned?


>> Am I basically given vaporware? Does anyone have any up to date info?
> 
> Have you considered Ruby on Rails?

Now that's just cruel.


-- 
Steven

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#20052

Fromanon hung <anonhung@gmail.com>
Date2012-02-09 05:55 +0100
Message-ID<mailman.5567.1328763326.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#20011
>>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>>> python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears thing..........
>>>
>>> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
>>> recent version but even that is being abandoned.
>>
>> Yup, looks dead to me.  Hasn't had a release in almost 2 months or a
>> commit to the GIT repo in 2 days.  Must be nailed to its perch or
>> something.
>>
>> http://turbogears.org/en/current-status
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/tg2/commit_browser
>
> Ohhh, sarcasm...
>
> To the original poster: what makes you think that Turbogears 2 is
> abandoned?

As I've said in another reply they keep talking about pyramid as if
that will be a totally new framework. I'm not saying I know things
definitely but surely my impression was that the team is out for
something new not based on turbogears 2.

>>> Am I basically given vaporware? Does anyone have any up to date info?
>>
>> Have you considered Ruby on Rails?
>
> Now that's just cruel.

Yep, it is :)

Best,
anonhung

-- 
Viktor Orban Prime minister of Hungary
http://spreadingviktororban.weebly.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#20053

Fromanon hung <anonhung@gmail.com>
Date2012-02-09 05:59 +0100
Message-ID<mailman.5568.1328763560.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#20011
>>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent in
>>> python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears thing..........
>>>
>>> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
>>> recent version but even that is being abandoned.
>>
>> Yup, looks dead to me.  Hasn't had a release in almost 2 months or a
>> commit to the GIT repo in 2 days.  Must be nailed to its perch or
>> something.
>>
>> http://turbogears.org/en/current-status
>> http://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/tg2/commit_browser
>
> Ohhh, sarcasm...
>
> To the original poster: what makes you think that Turbogears 2 is
> abandoned?

The development team keeps talking about pyramid which is supposed to
be a totally new framework. I don't pretend to understand the work
flow but surely they got me confused about switching gears (no pun
intended!).

>>> Am I basically given vaporware? Does anyone have any up to date info?
>>
>> Have you considered Ruby on Rails?
>
> Now that's just cruel.

Yep, it is :)

Best,
anonhung


-- 
Viktor Orban Prime minister of Hungary
http://spreadingviktororban.weebly.com



-- 
Viktor Orban Prime minister of Hungary
http://spreadingviktororban.weebly.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#20051

Fromanon hung <anonhung@gmail.com>
Date2012-02-09 05:53 +0100
Message-ID<mailman.5566.1328763222.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#20007
>> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
>> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
>> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
>> thing..........
>>
>> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
>> recent version but even that is being abandoned.
>
> Yup, looks dead to me.  Hasn't had a release in almost 2 months or a
> commit to the GIT repo in 2 days.  Must be nailed to its perch or
> something.
>
> http://turbogears.org/en/current-status
> http://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/tg2/commit_browser

All right, what I got confused about is that they talk about pyramid
these days which will not be turbogears 2 based.

>> Am I basically given vaporware? Does anyone have any up to date info?
>
> Have you considered Ruby on Rails?

This is joke, right? :)

Best,
anonhung


-- 
Viktor Orban Prime minister of Hungary
http://spreadingviktororban.weebly.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#20075

FromRoy Smith <roy@panix.com>
Date2012-02-09 09:01 -0500
Message-ID<roy-761135.09014209022012@news.panix.com>
In reply to#20051
In article <mailman.5566.1328763222.27778.python-list@python.org>,
 anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> wrote:

> >> Hey guys, someone asked me to maintain his old website, trouble is,
> >> it's in python, more trouble is it's in turbogears 1. I'm not fluent
> >> in python but all right, I can learn, but this turbogears
> >> thing..........
> >>
> >> First of all, is it still alive? Looks like turbogears 2 is the most
> >> recent version but even that is being abandoned.
> >
> > Yup, looks dead to me.  Hasn't had a release in almost 2 months or a
> > commit to the GIT repo in 2 days.  Must be nailed to its perch or
> > something.
> >
> > http://turbogears.org/en/current-status
> > http://sourceforge.net/p/turbogears2/tg2/commit_browser
> 
> All right, what I got confused about is that they talk about pyramid
> these days which will not be turbogears 2 based.
> 
> >> Am I basically given vaporware? Does anyone have any up to date info?
> >
> > Have you considered Ruby on Rails?
> 
> This is joke, right? :)

Yes.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#20085

FromDennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Date2012-02-09 11:26 -0500
Message-ID<mailman.5596.1328804828.27778.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#20075
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:01:42 -0500, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote:

>In article <mailman.5566.1328763222.27778.python-list@python.org>,
> anon hung <anonhung@gmail.com> wrote:
>
	<snip to a missing attribution line>

>> > Have you considered Ruby on Rails?
>> 
>> This is joke, right? :)
>
>Yes.

	The suggestion to use RoR... Or RoR itself?
-- 
	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
        wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web