Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63916 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-15 03:37 +1100 |
| Last post | 2014-01-15 03:37 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: efficient way to process data Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-15 03:37 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-15 03:37 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: efficient way to process data |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5465.1389717471.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:23 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote: >> As far as I'm concerned, you won geek cred the moment you said >> "electron microscope", and "semiconductor wafers as they are being >> manufactured" is just gravy. > > Thanks! You made my day. I showed this to my wife and she asked "Is that good?" Heh! Geek language can be a bit weird at times. Of course, it's not a dream job if things like this get tantalizingly dangled in front of you and then taken away as you're given something less fun and more urgent to do... >> Do you actually mean here that the two points need to be within 1 >> micron, or that data gets combined if it's nearby in *either* >> coordinate? > > Either coordinate. Okay, so the code I put together earlier in the thread is correct. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web