Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #53558 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-09-03 09:32 +0200 |
| Last post | 2013-09-03 09:32 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: semicolon at end of python's statements Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2013-09-03 09:32 +0200
| From | Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-09-03 09:32 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: semicolon at end of python's statements |
| Message-ID | <mailman.533.1378193563.19984.python-list@python.org> |
Op 03-09-13 01:17, Modulok schreef: > > So? Indeed there are too many people looking at these things as fighting > for the one true way. That is IMO part a big part of the problem. I have > no problem if someone else uses a different style than I do. Python as > a language tries too hard to enforce a one true way. > > Try maintaining a non-trivial body of JavaScript, or Perl (that you didn't > write) for a while. You'll soon appreciate the One True Way of thinking lol. My impression is that everyone appreciates the One True Way but only because they identify their own way as the One True Way. And sure it can be a good thing to enforce a One True Way for a specific project or for all company code, but there is no need that all projects would need the same One True Way. -- Antoon Pardon
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web