Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19608 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Charles Yeomans <charles@declareSub.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-01-30 13:56 -0500 |
| Last post | 2012-01-30 13:56 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: except clause syntax question Charles Yeomans <charles@declareSub.com> - 2012-01-30 13:56 -0500
| From | Charles Yeomans <charles@declareSub.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-30 13:56 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: except clause syntax question |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5220.1327949774.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On Jan 30, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Aaron wrote: > On 01/30/2012 06:41 PM, Charles Yeomans wrote: >> To catch more than one exception type in an except block, one writes >> >> except (A, B, C) as e: >> >> I'm wondering why it was decided to match tuples, but not lists: >> >> except [A, B, C] as e: >> >> The latter makes more sense semantically to me -- "catch all exception types in a list" as opposed to "catch this single thing composed of three exception types". >> >> >> Charles Yeomans >> >> > > Then, semantically, shouldn't it be a set? Why, I suppose that would make even more sense. Charles Yeomans
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web