Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #63468 > unrolled thread

Re: Editor for Python

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Editor for Python ayushpokharna@gmail.com - 2014-01-08 03:27 -0800
    Re: Editor for Python Douglas Duhaime <douglas.duhaime@gmail.com> - 2014-01-08 09:23 -0500
    Re: Editor for Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-08 15:47 -0500
    Re: Editor for Python Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2014-01-08 12:56 -0800
    Re: Editor for Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-08 21:02 +0000
    Re: Editor for Python Ricardo Aráoz <ricaraoz@gmail.com> - 2014-01-08 18:38 -0300
    Re: Editor for Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-08 18:46 -0500
    Re: Editor for Python Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2014-01-08 16:19 -0800
    Re: Editor for Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-09 11:23 +1100
    Re: Editor for Python Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-08 20:51 -0500
    Re: Editor for Python TP <wingusr@gmail.com> - 2014-01-09 07:29 -0800

#63468 — Re: Editor for Python

On Friday, 23 November 2001 04:13:40 UTC+5:30, MANUEL FERNANDEZ PEREZ  wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm looking for an editor for Python.I' m interested it works on Windows.Can
> anybody help me?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Manuel

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#63480

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

I've been pleased with Komodo, and certainly prefer it over Notepad++.

Komodo:
http://www.activestate.com/komodo-ide?gclid=COHE4eLj7rsCFQISMwodOUQAiw


On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Jean-Michel Pichavant <
jeanmichel@sequans.com> wrote:

> ----- Original Message -----
> > On Friday, 23 November 2001 04:13:40 UTC+5:30, MANUEL FERNANDEZ PEREZ
> >  wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I'm looking for an editor for Python.I' m interested it works on
> > > Windows.Can
> > > anybody help me?
> > >
> > > Thank you
> > >
> > > Manuel
>
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=python+editor+windows
>
> Otherwise, must of the newcomers will be pleased with
> http://notepad-plus-plus.org/
>
> Ideally, try to use an editor that will allow you to edit any type of
> code, python or anything else.
>
> JM
>
> PS : you could also have searched this archive, this subject has been
> already discussed... a lot.
>
>
> -- IMPORTANT NOTICE:
>
> The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may
> also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
> the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other
> person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any
> medium. Thank you.
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>



-- 
Douglas Duhaime
Department of English, University of Notre Dame
douglasduhaime.com, dduhaime@nd.edu

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63520

On 1/8/2014 6:27 AM, ayushpokharna@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, 23 November 2001 04:13:40 UTC+5:30, MANUEL FERNANDEZ PEREZ  wrote:

I do not seem to have the original

>> I'm looking for an editor for Python. I' m interested it works on Windows.

For a Python editor, as opposed to a general code editor, the Idle 
editor works pretty well and has some advantages with respect to 
integration with the interpreter.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63521

On 1/8/2014 12:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:

> For a Python editor, as opposed to a general code editor, the Idle
> editor works pretty well and has some advantages with respect to
> integration with the interpreter.

While true, ISTM in the past there have been 'leakage' related issues 
with idle -- are those no longer a concern?

Emile

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63522

On 08/01/2014 20:47, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/8/2014 6:27 AM, ayushpokharna@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, 23 November 2001 04:13:40 UTC+5:30, MANUEL FERNANDEZ PEREZ
>> wrote:
>
> I do not seem to have the original
>

You mean to say you don't keep 12 year old emails? :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63523

I use Spyder both in Windows as in Linux.
Pretty good programing environment, lots of features, simple enough, 
works on both platforms and it's free.


El 08/01/14 08:27, ayushpokharna@gmail.com escribió:
> On Friday, 23 November 2001 04:13:40 UTC+5:30, MANUEL FERNANDEZ PEREZ  wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'm looking for an editor for Python.I' m interested it works on Windows.Can
>> anybody help me?
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Manuel

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63538

On 1/8/2014 3:56 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 1/8/2014 12:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>> For a Python editor, as opposed to a general code editor, the Idle
>> editor works pretty well and has some advantages with respect to
>> integration with the interpreter.
>
> While true, ISTM in the past there have been 'leakage' related issues
> with idle -- are those no longer a concern?

I have looked through most of the Idle issues on the tracker but do not 
remember anything about 'leakage' (of memory?)

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63544

On 1/8/2014 3:46 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 1/8/2014 3:56 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
>> On 1/8/2014 12:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>
>>> For a Python editor, as opposed to a general code editor, the Idle
>>> editor works pretty well and has some advantages with respect to
>>> integration with the interpreter.
>>
>> While true, ISTM in the past there have been 'leakage' related issues
>> with idle -- are those no longer a concern?
>
> I have looked through most of the Idle issues on the tracker but do not
> remember anything about 'leakage' (of memory?)

Of names I think.

As I recall it had something to do with both idle and the application 
running in the same namespace?  So the leakage was from within idle 
affecting the running of the script under development?

Admittedly, it was a while back.  But I never went back to idle 
afterwards either...

Emile

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63547

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> wrote:
> As I recall it had something to do with both idle and the application
> running in the same namespace?  So the leakage was from within idle
> affecting the running of the script under development?
>
> Admittedly, it was a while back.  But I never went back to idle afterwards
> either...

Personally, I don't edit source files in IDLE - I use SciTE or another
editor for that. IDLE is, to me, an interactive Python session and
nothing more. I find it better than command-line Python because it
recalls entire blocks of code; it's not a superior editor to one that
can do every language I want all in one window.

ChrisA

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63553

On 1/8/2014 7:19 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
> On 1/8/2014 3:46 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>> On 1/8/2014 3:56 PM, Emile van Sebille wrote:
>>> On 1/8/2014 12:47 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>>
>>>> For a Python editor, as opposed to a general code editor, the Idle
>>>> editor works pretty well and has some advantages with respect to
>>>> integration with the interpreter.
>>>
>>> While true, ISTM in the past there have been 'leakage' related issues
>>> with idle -- are those no longer a concern?

Almost not, see below.

>> I have looked through most of the Idle issues on the tracker but do not
>> remember anything about 'leakage' (of memory?)
>
> Of names I think.
>
> As I recall it had something to do with both idle and the application
> running in the same namespace?  So the leakage was from within idle
> affecting the running of the script under development?

By default, Idle runs user code in a separate process from the Idle 
process itself, and has for several years. There is a command line 
option to revert to the old way (user code in the same process). Some of 
us would like to remove that option (and simplify the remaining code a 
bit). This option is kept mainly because connecting to the separate 
process via sockets sometimes fails on some systems.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#63607

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Friday, 23 November 2001 04:13:40 UTC+5:30, MANUEL FERNANDEZ PEREZ
 wrote:

> > Hello,
> > I'm looking for an editor for Python.I' m interested it works on
> Windows.Can
> > anybody help me?
>
It's an IDE rather than "just" an editor but how about PyCharm 3 Community
Edition? [1]

[1] https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web