Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19528 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Giovanni Funchal <gafunchal@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-01-27 22:48 +0000 |
| Last post | 2012-01-28 08:04 -0800 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Patching CGIHTTPServer.py Giovanni Funchal <gafunchal@gmail.com> - 2012-01-27 22:48 +0000
Re: Patching CGIHTTPServer.py Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> - 2012-01-28 08:04 -0800
Re: Patching CGIHTTPServer.py Giovanni Funchal <gafunchal@gmail.com> - 2012-02-01 21:24 +0000
Re: Patching CGIHTTPServer.py Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> - 2012-01-28 08:04 -0800
| From | Giovanni Funchal <gafunchal@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-27 22:48 +0000 |
| Subject | Patching CGIHTTPServer.py |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5160.1327704566.27778.python-list@python.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi everyone, I was fiddling around with CGIHTTPServer.py --- a very handy module for quickly setting up a full HTTP server with CGI support --- when I noticed that it doesn't support responses other than "200 OK". So, for instance if your page wants to do a redirect (response 303), it just isn't supported. I think this is a major drawback that can be easily overcome and I'd very happily contribute that as an enhancement. But... I'm new to Python and as a matter of fact web programming as a whole isn't really my specialty. I was thinking that maybe someone could spend half an hour looking at my solution and help raising it's quality to the level I can submit it as a patch proposal. Cheers, -- Giovanni
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-28 08:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <30772597.282.1327766678735.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqjk7> |
| In reply to | #19528 |
IMO the code is good enough to submit a patch.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Giovanni Funchal <gafunchal@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-02-01 21:24 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5324.1328131517.27778.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #19548 |
Wow, that's very flattering :-) I've opened an item in the python bug tracker for this enhancement and attached my patch, let's see how it goes. Thanks, -- Giovanni On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> wrote: > IMO the code is good enough to submit a patch. > -- > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-28 08:04 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5176.1327766687.27778.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #19528 |
IMO the code is good enough to submit a patch.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web