Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #51175 > unrolled thread

Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys()

Started byEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
First post2013-07-24 16:22 -0700
Last post2013-07-24 16:22 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-07-24 16:22 -0700

#51175 — Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys()

FromEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Date2013-07-24 16:22 -0700
SubjectRe: Python 3: dict & dict.keys()
Message-ID<mailman.5072.1374709915.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 07/24/2013 01:34 PM, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
>
> I am still not clear on the advantage of views vs. iterators. What
> makes d.viewkeys() better than d.iterkeys()? Why did they decide
> not to rename d.iterkeys() to d.keys() and instead use d.viewkeys()?
> Is the iteration over a set operation on keys really that common a
> use case?

 From a practical standpoint, iterkeys() is a one-shot deal, while viewkeys() can be iterated over multiple times:

--> d = {1: 'one', 2: 'two', 3: 'three'}

--> di = d.iterkeys()

--> list(di)
[1, 2, 3]

--> list(di)
[]

--> dv = d.viewkeys()

--> list(dv)
[1, 2, 3]

--> list(dv)
[1, 2, 3]

And views are not sets -- they just support a couple set-like operations.

--
~Ethan~

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web