Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63341 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-06 15:53 -0500 |
| Last post | 2014-01-06 15:53 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-06 15:53 -0500
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 15:53 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5061.1389041706.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 1/6/2014 10:10 AM, Ethan Furman wrote: > The argument is that a very important, if small, subset a data > manipulation become very painful in Py3. Not impossible, and not > difficult, but painful because the mental model and the contortions > needed to get things to work don't sync up anymore. Thank you for a succinct summary. I presume you are referring in part by bytes manipulations that would be easier with bytes.format. In http://bugs.python.org/issue3982 Guido gave approval in principle to a minimal new method a year ago. The proponents failed to build on that to get anything in 3.4. Finally, however, Viktor Stinner has written a PEP http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0460/ so something might happen for 3.5. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web