Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63326 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-06 13:41 -0600 |
| Last post | 2014-01-06 13:41 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: the Gravity of Python 2 Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2014-01-06 13:41 -0600
| From | Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 13:41 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: the Gravity of Python 2 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5047.1389037301.18130.python-list@python.org> |
> http://blog.startifact.com/posts/python-2-gravity.html > > "A Way Forward - How to go forward then? I think it makes sense to work as > hard as possible to lift those Python 2 codebases out of the gravity well." > > I think this is complete nonsense. There's only been five years since the > first release of Python 3. Surely much more time should be made available > for people using Python 2 to plan for a migration? What makes no sense is that you've started a whole 'nother thread on an issue whose gravity is right here, already on the list. Add your new commentary and links to existing threads would be easier, yes? Mark unLawrence
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web