Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63278 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-06 13:45 +0100 |
| Last post | 2014-01-06 10:53 -0800 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
informal #python2.8 channel on freenode Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com> - 2014-01-06 13:45 +0100
Re: informal #python2.8 channel on freenode Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> - 2014-01-06 10:53 -0800
| From | Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 13:45 +0100 |
| Subject | informal #python2.8 channel on freenode |
| Message-ID | <8b12b$52caa550$541826b9$23016@cache1.tilbu1.nb.home.nl> |
Fellow Pythoneers, I've started an informal channel "#python2.8" on freenode. It's to discuss the potential for a Python 2.8 version -- to see whether there is interest in it, what it could contain, how it could facilitate porting to Python 3, who would work on it, etc. If you are interested in constructive discussion about a Python 2.8, please join. I realize that if there is actual code created, and if it's not under the umbrella of the PSF, it couldn't be called "Python 2.8" due to trademark reasons. But that's premature - let's have some discussions first to see whether anything can happen. Hope to see you there for some discussion! Regards, Martijn
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Emile van Sebille <emile@fenx.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-06 10:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5040.1389034408.18130.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #63278 |
Why not contribute to the planned Stackless 2.8? As I understand their direction, they'll be backporting certain v3.x features and will be prepping both SLP and nonSLP versions. Emile On 01/06/2014 04:45 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Fellow Pythoneers, > > I've started an informal channel "#python2.8" on freenode. It's to > discuss the potential for a Python 2.8 version -- to see whether there > is interest in it, what it could contain, how it could facilitate > porting to Python 3, who would work on it, etc. If you are interested in > constructive discussion about a Python 2.8, please join. > > I realize that if there is actual code created, and if it's not under > the umbrella of the PSF, it couldn't be called "Python 2.8" due to > trademark reasons. But that's premature - let's have some discussions > first to see whether anything can happen. > > Hope to see you there for some discussion! > > Regards, > > Martijn
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web