Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #51127 > unrolled thread

Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys()

Started byOscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com>
First post2013-07-24 13:51 +0100
Last post2013-07-24 13:51 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys() Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2013-07-24 13:51 +0100

#51127 — Re: Python 3: dict & dict.keys()

FromOscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com>
Date2013-07-24 13:51 +0100
SubjectRe: Python 3: dict & dict.keys()
Message-ID<mailman.5033.1374670298.3114.python-list@python.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Jul 24, 2013 7:25 AM, "Peter Otten" <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
>
> Ethan Furman wrote:
>
> > So, my question boils down to:  in Python 3 how is dict.keys() different
> > from dict?  What are the use cases?
>
> I just grepped through /usr/lib/python3, and could not identify a single
> line where some_object.keys() wasn't either wrapped in a list (or set,
> sorted, max) call, or iterated over.
>
> To me it looks like views are a solution waiting for a problem.

What do you mean? Why would you want to create a temporary list just to
iterate over it explicitly or implicitly (set, sorted, max,...)?

Oscar

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web