Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19331 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-01-24 19:31 +1100 |
| Last post | 2012-01-24 19:31 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: String interning in Python 3 - missing or moved? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-24 19:31 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-24 19:31 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: String interning in Python 3 - missing or moved? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5020.1327393892.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> wrote: > If you want to encourage them to fill up their memory with user provided > data in a non-erasable way, then sure, that would certainly keep an > attacker from having to figure out hash collisions in order to bring down a > system. Sending *any* arbitrarily varied data would be enough then. Interning doesn't have to imply non-erasable. And filling memory is a LOT harder than slowing something down with O(n^2) hashtable worst-casing. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web