Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #63253 > unrolled thread

Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3"

Started byEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
First post2014-01-05 16:46 -0800
Last post2014-01-05 16:46 -0800
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-01-05 16:46 -0800

#63253 — Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3"

FromEthan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Date2014-01-05 16:46 -0800
SubjectRe: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3"
Message-ID<mailman.4994.1388972182.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 01/05/2014 05:14 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
> Please don't shoot the messenger :)

While I don't agree with his assessment of Python 3 in total, I definitely feel his pain with regards to bytestrings in 
Py3 -- because they don't exist.  'bytes' /looks/ like a bytestring, but really it's just a bunch of integers:

--> b'abc
'b'abc'
--> b'abc'[1]
98

Maybe for 3.5 somebody *cough* will make a bytestring type for those of us who have to support the lower-level protocols...

--
~Ethan~

*Cast your vote over on Python Ideas!

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web