Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63253 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-05 16:46 -0800 |
| Last post | 2014-01-05 16:46 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-01-05 16:46 -0800
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 16:46 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4994.1388972182.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 01/05/2014 05:14 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > > Please don't shoot the messenger :) While I don't agree with his assessment of Python 3 in total, I definitely feel his pain with regards to bytestrings in Py3 -- because they don't exist. 'bytes' /looks/ like a bytestring, but really it's just a bunch of integers: --> b'abc 'b'abc' --> b'abc'[1] 98 Maybe for 3.5 somebody *cough* will make a bytestring type for those of us who have to support the lower-level protocols... -- ~Ethan~ *Cast your vote over on Python Ideas!
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web