Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #43409 > unrolled thread

Re: OOPv2 -- Was: [Python-ideas] Reviving PEP 3140 - "str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)"

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: OOPv2 -- Was: [Python-ideas] Reviving PEP 3140 - "str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)" Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2013-04-11 17:54 -0700

#43409 — Re: OOPv2 -- Was: [Python-ideas] Reviving PEP 3140 - "str(container) should call str(item), not repr(item)"

On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 01:29, Mark Janssen wrote:
>>
>>
>> You are right.  It might not be realistic given the Python developer
>> environment at present.   In fact, I'm moving the thread out of
>> python-ideas into python-list since Guido doesn't want to discuss it.
>
> Please don't.

Sorry, not the whole repr() vs str() thread, just the inquiry about
rethinking OOP....

Mark

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web