Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63190 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-05 08:22 -0500 |
| Last post | 2014-01-05 08:22 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-01-05 08:22 -0500
| From | Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-05 08:22 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4943.1388928170.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 1/5/14 8:14 AM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2014/1/5/unicode-in-2-and-3/ > > Please don't shoot the messenger :) > With all of the talk about py 2 vs. py3 these days, this is the blog post that I think deserves the most real attention. I haven't had to do the kind of coding that Armin is talking about, but I've heard more than one person talk about the difficulty of it in Python 3. If anyone wants Python 3 uptake improved, the best thing would be to either explain to Armin how he missed the easy way to do what he wants (seems unlikely), or advocate to the core devs why they should change things to improve this situation. -- Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web