Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #19139 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-01-19 13:13 -0800 |
| Last post | 2012-01-19 13:13 -0800 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: verify the return value of a function Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-01-19 13:13 -0800
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-19 13:13 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: verify the return value of a function |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4873.1327007605.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Jabba Laci <jabba.laci@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > In a unit test, I want to verify that a function returns a > cookielib.LWPCookieJar object. What is the correct way of doing that? <snip> > 3) isinstance(return_value, cookielib.LWPCookieJar) seems to be the > best way, however somewhere I read that using isinstance is > discouraged Explicit typechecking is often discouraged in favor of duck typing. However, if you want to do explicit typechecking (as one might in unit tests), then isinstance() is absolutely the technique to use. The alternative would be to check for the specific attributes of LWPCookieJar that you're relying upon (using hasattr() or similar), but that's probably overkill here. Cheers, Chris -- http://rebertia.com
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web