Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #19094 > unrolled thread

Re: "+=" does not work correct all alogn

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: "+=" does not work correct all alogn Arnaud Delobelle <arnodel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-18 17:09 +0000
    Re: "+=" does not work correct all alogn woooee <woooee@gmail.com> - 2012-01-18 09:42 -0800

#19094 — Re: "+=" does not work correct all alogn

On 18 January 2012 09:52, Wilfried Falk <w_h_falk@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hello Pythons,
>
> attached to this email is a pdf-file which shows, that  "+=" does not work
> well all along. Mybe somebody of you is able to explain my observations in
> this respect. I will be glad about an answer.

I think you are more likely to get answers if you post your code in
the body of your message rather than attach it in a pdf, which is
quite an unusual thing to do!

"""
1.) For   identifier += 1   you sometimes get    print(); identifier =
identifier + 1
What means that there is a prior  print().  I could not find out a
rule for when this happens --- but it
does. By replaceing  identifier += 1   with   identifier = identifier
+ 1    the malfunction (print()) allways
disappears
"""

I can't comment on this as you don't provide any code.

"""
2.)  Another  "mystery"  is shown by the code below. There   _list +=
[something]    is not the same
as   _list = _list + [something].
def conc1(a, _list = []):
    _list = _list + [a]
    return _list
def conc2(a, _list = []):
    _list += [a]
    return _list
# Main Program
for i in range(4):
    _list = conc1(i)
    print(_list)
print()
for i in range(4):
    _list = conc2(i)
    print(_list)
In the first case the result of   print(_list)   is:
[0]
[1]
[2]
[3]
In the second case the result of   print(_list)   is:
[0]
[0, 1]
[0, 1, 2]
[0, 1, 2, 3]
"""

This behaviour is not a bug, it is a consequence of two things:

1. The way mutable default arguments work in Python.  Your
misunderstanding is a very common one for Python beginners.  There's a
good explanation of the behaviour here:

    http://effbot.org/zone/default-values.htm

2. The difference between

    lst += [a]

and

    lst = lst + [a]

The first one mutates the list object named 'lst' by appending 'a' at
its end, whereas the second one creates a new list made of the items
of lst with 'a' appended at the end.  So your function conc1 does not
mutate _list, whereas your function conc2 does.

HTH

-- 
Arnaud

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#19095

> def conc1(a, _list = []):
>     _list = _list + [a]
>     return _list

> for i in range(4):
>     _list = conc1(i)   ## <----- list not passed

You don't pass the list to the conc1 function, so you start with the
default, an empty list, each time.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web