Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #18979 > unrolled thread

defining class and subclass in C

Started byDaniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
First post2012-01-14 22:15 +0100
Last post2012-01-14 17:26 -0800
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  defining class and subclass in C Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 22:15 +0100
    Re: defining class and subclass in C Tim Roberts <timr@probo.com> - 2012-01-14 17:26 -0800

#18979 — defining class and subclass in C

FromDaniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com>
Date2012-01-14 22:15 +0100
Subjectdefining class and subclass in C
Message-ID<mailman.4751.1326575767.27778.python-list@python.org>
Hi all.

I spent some days and nights on this already and my google-fu is running out.

I'd like to implement the equivalent of this Python code in a C-extension:

>>> class A(object):
...  pass
>>> class B(A):
...  pass
>>> A
<class '__main__.A'>
>>> B
<class '__main__.B'>
>>> B.__bases__
(<class '__main__.A'>,)

However, loading my C-code (quoted below) I get:

>>> import ca
>>> ca
<module 'ca' from 'ca.so'>
>>> ca.ca
<type 'ca.ca'>

Here I'd expect "<class 'ca.ca'>" instead?! And I never managed a proper 
subclass :|

The point of the excercise: with "ca" and "cb" properly implemented, I'd like 
to subclass "cb" not from "ca", but from the Python "class A" - if possible?!

Could somepne kindly point out my mistake(s) and set me back on track?

Thanks

	Daniel

--
#include <Python.h>

typedef struct {
  PyObject_HEAD
} ca;

static PyTypeObject ca_Type = {
  PyObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL)
};

PyMODINIT_FUNC initca(void) {
  PyObject *ca;

  ca_Type.tp_name      = "ca.ca";
  ca_Type.tp_basicsize = sizeof(ca);
  ca_Type.tp_flags     = Py_TPFLAGS_DEFAULT | Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE;

  if (PyType_Ready(&ca_Type) < 0)
    return;

  ca = Py_InitModule3("ca", NULL, "ca module");
  if (ca == NULL)
    return;

  Py_INCREF(&ca_Type);
  PyModule_AddObject(ca, "ca", (PyObject*)&ca_Type);
}

$ gcc -Wall -Wextra -g -fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.7 ca.c \
      -shared -Wl,-soname,ca.so -o ca.so -lpython2.7

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#18988

FromTim Roberts <timr@probo.com>
Date2012-01-14 17:26 -0800
Message-ID<kia4h7pculm1ap86o6mr49op75nmol90in@4ax.com>
In reply to#18979
Daniel Franke <franke.daniel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>I'd like to implement the equivalent of this Python code in a C-extension:
>
>>>> class A(object):
>...  pass
>>>> class B(A):
>...  pass
>>>> A
><class '__main__.A'>
>>>> B
><class '__main__.B'>
>>>> B.__bases__
>(<class '__main__.A'>,)
>
>However, loading my C-code (quoted below) I get:
>
>>>> import ca
>>>> ca
><module 'ca' from 'ca.so'>
>>>> ca.ca
><type 'ca.ca'>
>
>Here I'd expect "<class 'ca.ca'>" instead?! And I never managed a proper 
>subclass :|

Notice this in your code:

static PyTypeObject ca_Type = {
  PyObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL)
};

You are creating a "type" object.  It shouldn't be a surprise that it is
displayed as a <type>, just like int and dict.

In a sweeping overgenerality, C modules define types and Python modules
define classes.  You could redefine the __repr__ method to display "<class
ca.ca>" if you want.
-- 
Tim Roberts, timr@probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web