Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #18945 > unrolled thread

Re: NaN, Null, and Sorting

Started byMRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
First post2012-01-13 21:06 +0000
Last post2012-01-13 21:06 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: NaN, Null, and Sorting MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-01-13 21:06 +0000

#18945 — Re: NaN, Null, and Sorting

FromMRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com>
Date2012-01-13 21:06 +0000
SubjectRe: NaN, Null, and Sorting
Message-ID<mailman.4730.1326488798.27778.python-list@python.org>
On 13/01/2012 19:58, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Ethan Furman<ethan@stoneleaf.us>  wrote:
>>  So I am strongly leaning towards implementing the comparisons such that Null
>>  objects are less than other objects so they will always sort together.
>
> This is a perfectly plausible view, and is the one adopted by SQL (I'm
> pretty sure the "NULLS FIRST" / "NULLS LAST" clause is standard - you
> get to choose whether they're less than everything or more than
> everything).
>
+1

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web