Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #18938 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-01-14 06:58 +1100 |
| Last post | 2012-01-14 06:58 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: NaN, Null, and Sorting Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-01-14 06:58 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-01-14 06:58 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: NaN, Null, and Sorting |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4726.1326484736.27778.python-list@python.org> |
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:04 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > So I am strongly leaning towards implementing the comparisons such that Null > objects are less than other objects so they will always sort together. This is a perfectly plausible view, and is the one adopted by SQL (I'm pretty sure the "NULLS FIRST" / "NULLS LAST" clause is standard - you get to choose whether they're less than everything or more than everything). ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web