Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #96491 > unrolled thread
| Started by | random832@fastmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-09-12 22:54 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-09-12 22:54 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? random832@fastmail.com - 2015-09-12 22:54 -0400
| From | random832@fastmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-12 22:54 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.471.1442140911.8327.python-list@python.org> |
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015, at 22:25, Tim Peters wrote: > That helps a lot, but "industrial-strength" implies "by algorithm". > There are far too many zones to deal with by crafting a hand-written > class for each. It occurs to me that though it's written in C, the zdump utility included in the tz code is implementation-agnostic w.r.t. what algorithm is used by the localtime function being tested. It's algorithm could probably be adapted to python.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web