Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #98186 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-03 14:45 -0500 |
| Last post | 2015-11-04 15:55 +0000 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Unbuffered stderr in Python 3 Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2015-11-03 14:45 -0500
Re: Unbuffered stderr in Python 3 Dave Farrance <df@see.replyto.invalid> - 2015-11-04 15:55 +0000
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 14:45 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Unbuffered stderr in Python 3 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.47.1446579961.8789.python-list@python.org> |
George Trojan <george.trojan@noaa.gov> writes: > This does set line buffering, but does not change the behaviour: The opposite of line buffering is not no buffering, but full (i.e. block) buffering, that doesn't get flushed until it runs out of space. TextIOWrapper has its own internal buffer, and its design apparently doesn't contemplate the possibility of using it with a raw FileIO object (which may mean that the posted code isn't guaranteed to work) or disabling buffering.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Farrance <df@see.replyto.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-04 15:55 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <h2ak3bh20v5kft7u87q6139ehircqp43vp@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #98186 |
Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> wrote:
>The opposite of line buffering is not no buffering, but full
>(i.e. block) buffering, that doesn't get flushed until it runs
>out of space. TextIOWrapper has its own internal buffer, and its
>design apparently doesn't contemplate the possibility of using
>it with a raw FileIO object (which may mean that the posted code
>isn't guaranteed to work) or disabling buffering.
Hmmm. That even seems to cause trouble for sys.stderr.write
(in Python3 with a non-tty e.g. a piped output):
$ python2 -c 'import sys;sys.stderr.write("1\n");print("2")' 2>&1 | tee
1
2
$ python3 -c 'import sys;sys.stderr.write("1\n");print("2")' 2>&1 | tee
2
1
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web