Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #101527 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-12 08:24 +0000 |
| Last post | 2016-01-12 08:24 +0000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: I'm missing something here... Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2016-01-12 08:24 +0000
| From | Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-12 08:24 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: I'm missing something here... |
| Message-ID | <mailman.46.1452587275.13488.python-list@python.org> |
On 12/01/16 07:13, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 11Jan2016 23:55, Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> wrote: >> Is it complaining about that, or is it because the 'for' loop body >> might be executed zero times? > > The former. Almost any loop _might_ be executed zero times. Compilers > and linters etc should only complain if they can prove the loop is > always executed zero times. Sure, but Skip was thinking he'd found a bug - I was just raising the possibility that the bug could have been that the loop was (incorrectly) determined to be executed zero times for some reason. E.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web