Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #50427 > unrolled thread

Re: Documenting builtin methods

Started byBen Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
First post2013-07-11 18:26 +1000
Last post2013-07-11 18:26 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Documenting builtin methods Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-07-11 18:26 +1000

#50427 — Re: Documenting builtin methods

FromBen Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Date2013-07-11 18:26 +1000
SubjectRe: Documenting builtin methods
Message-ID<mailman.4576.1373531195.3114.python-list@python.org>
Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> writes:

> On 11 July 2013 05:13, Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> wrote:
> > <misunderstanding in response to misunderstanding>
>
> Ah, I get it. It is easy to misread my post as "I have this
> exhaust_iter" and it's obvious it doesn't work because why else would
> I post here what do I do HALP!

Right. Just because you think there's one obvious interpretation of your
cry for help, doesn't mean there's *only* one obvious interpretation.

It's best to be explicit: describe what behaviour you're seeing, and
what behaviour you're expecting to see.

-- 
 \       “We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the |
  `\       sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his |
_o__)     wife is beautiful and his children smart.” —Henry L. Mencken |
Ben Finney

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web